Modern dating didn't get complicated by accident. It got populated. Here is almost everyone you will encounter before you find someone who actually knows why they're there.
Male-coded
Neutral
Female-coded
Section 1
The Field Guide
At a glance — every type, named and summed up in one line.
The Mysterio
The less they shared, the more they expected.
The Benchmark
You are being compared to someone you will never meet.
The Bio Philosopher
What worst means is left to the reader.
The Situationship Specialist
Should have read the fine print.
The Arrangement
The arrangement was always clear. You just weren't shown the contract.
The Just Browsing
The profile is the tell. The bio is the cover.
The full lexicon · 21 types

Six down. Fifteen to go.

That is a first look — six of the twenty-one. Join the Em waitlist to unlock the rest of the field guide and every full entry: the definitions, where you will spot them, the tell-tale signs and the verdicts.

Join Em early access. No spam — just a smarter way to date.

The Template
Different face. Same profile. Same dog.
The Oversharer
You are a mirror with a profile picture.
The Filter Master
The first meeting involves quiet recalibration.
The Sprinter
The race ended at the finish line.
The Small Talk Specialist
Not avoiding you. Avoiding themselves.
The Crowd Sourcer
You have guessed wrong twice.
The Keyboard Lover
The bar was the floor.
The Penpal
Meeting? Soon. Always soon.
The Requirement Lister
The position has been vacant for some time.
The Passenger
Lovely company. Never once took the wheel.
The Fence-Sitter
The fence is permanent.
The Age Avoider
The number is approximate.
The Asterisk
The footnote was always there. You just weren't shown it.
The Prospectus
The prospectus outperformed the product.
The Holdover
The hope left. The profile stayed.
Section 2
Gender Neutral Lexicon
9 archetypes encountered equally regardless of who you are or who you're looking for.
The Benchmark
bench·mark /ˈbentʃ.mɑːk/
Every conversation eventually, reliably, circles back to someone who is not you. "My ex used to do that differently." "That's not what I'm used to." The ex is the third person in every exchange — never named directly, always present, always the standard against which you are being quietly evaluated. They are not over it. The profile does not mention this. You are not being dated. You are being benchmarked against a person you will never meet and cannot compete with — because they exist only as a memory now, and memories are always edited in the subject's favour.
Where found
Any sentence beginning with "my ex used to…"
Bios that say "finally ready to move on" — they are not
The person clearly still having the old relationship in their head
"Third date. Ex mentioned four times. I am being compared to someone I will never meet."
You are being compared to someone you will never meet.
See also
The OversharerThe Holdover
The Arrangement
ar·range·ment /əˈreɪndʒ.mənt/
Has a very clear idea of what they want — one-night stand, friends with benefits, weekend partner, weekday partner — and it fits neatly into a specific time slot, day of the week, or set of circumstances that does not expand beyond the agreed parameters. Not dishonest, not avoidant — in some cases entirely upfront about it. The arrangement suits them perfectly. The problem, when there is one, is that the other person did not realise they had agreed to terms. Somewhere, there is a line that does not get crossed, and you will find it the moment you try.
Where found
Wonderful on Friday nights. Unreachable by Sunday morning.
"Friends with benefits" stated as a contract, not a suggestion
Any situation where terms were implied rather than stated
"Everything was warm and consistent — within very specific hours. I suggested a Tuesday. There was a long pause."
The arrangement was always clear. You just weren't shown the contract.
See also
The Situationship SpecialistThe Fence-Sitter
The Oversharer
o·ver·sha·rer /ˌəʊ.vəˈʃeər.ər/
Arrived having confused a dating app with a confessional. Within twenty minutes, you are fully briefed on their toxic mother, their dead-end job, and the friend who stabbed them in the back in 2018 — and the break-up. Warm, articulate, and entirely unbothered by the fact they haven't asked a single question about you. You aren't a date. You are an unpaid therapist, a live audience, and a mirror with a profile picture — and that mirror is getting exhausted.
Where found
Opening line: "So I've been going through a lot lately…"
Bios: "healing and growing, looking for my person"
Forty minutes in and you still haven't spoken
"Three voice notes about their ex before I'd said hello. Still hasn't asked my name properly."
You are a mirror with a profile picture.
See also
The PenpalThe Fence-Sitter
The Small Talk Specialist
small talk spe·cia·list /smɔːl tɔːk ˈspeʃ.əl.ɪst/
Has mastered the art of saying a great deal while revealing absolutely nothing of consequence. The weather, the weekend plans, the traffic — all covered in generous and entirely safe detail. Ask something real and the conversation develops a sudden and mysterious lag. They are not avoiding you. They are avoiding the version of themselves that would have to show up if you got any closer.
Where found
Three weeks of chat that has moved precisely nowhere
Every reply: warm, pleasant, entirely without substance
"What are you actually looking for?" — read, never answered
"Eleven days of good morning texts. Zero actual information exchanged."
Not avoiding you. Avoiding themselves.
See also
The PenpalThe Fence-Sitter
The Penpal
pen·pal /ˈpen.pæl/
Has perfected the relationship without the relationship. Good morning texts arrive reliably. Voice notes, articles, the occasional meme — all delivered with warmth and impressive regularity. The conversation never runs dry. The meeting never happens. Meeting feels rushed, they say. You eventually realise they are running this exact correspondence with several people simultaneously — all of whom are also waiting for a plan that will never quite be made.
Where found
Your most active chat — a month in, zero plans made
Responds within seconds. Somehow never free to meet.
"Love deep conversations and real connections" in the bio
"A month of daily voice notes. Still haven't met. I think the app is the relationship."
Meeting? Soon. Always soon.
See also
The Small Talk SpecialistThe Oversharer
The Fence-Sitter
fence-sit·ter /ˈfens ˌsɪt.ər/
Gives the perfect answer to every question — and a completely different perfect answer the following day. Wants commitment. Also needs space. Wants something serious but nothing too heavy right now. Is talking to everyone and closing absolutely no doors. Not indecisive exactly — simply unwilling to choose anything that would require them to stop considering everything else. The fence, it turns out, is not a temporary position. It is the destination.
Where found
"I know what I want, just haven't found it yet" — year three
Relationship goals that change measurably with their mood
"Almost ready" — used continuously for six months
"Monday: serious. Thursday: needs space. Sunday: open to seeing where things go. The fence is permanent."
The fence is permanent.
See also
The OversharerThe Situationship Specialist
The Asterisk
as·te·risk /ˈæs.tər.ɪsk/
Married but "separated." Separated but practically still at home. Divorced but it's complicated, currently. Thirty-five but depending on how generously you count. Everything told to you is technically a version of the truth — a carefully selected, favourably edited version with certain chapters omitted. The footnote was always there. It simply was not shared. You find it eventually, usually after investing several months in a story that had a different ending all along.
Where found
"Separated" meaning they slept in different rooms after a fight
"Single" meaning no one has found out yet
Takes every call outside. Always. Without exception.
"Separated for two years, they said. Family holiday together last month. The footnote was always there."
The footnote was always there. You just weren't shown it.
See also
The Fence-SitterThe Mysterio
The Prospectus
pros·pec·tus /prəˈspek.təs/
Lists every desirable feature with the polished confidence of a product launch. Bibliophile. Sapiosexual. Passionate traveller. Lover of deep conversations. In practice, the last book was read in college, the last trip was a cousin's wedding, and the deep conversation turns out to be medium-depth at a generous estimate. They are not lying — they are describing the person they have been genuinely meaning to become since 2019. The prospectus, as always, was considerably more interesting than the product.
Where found
Three personality labels. Not one full sentence about themselves.
All listed interests are hobbies they plan to take up
Any bio that reads better than the person it describes
"Said bibliophile. Favourite book: 'I mostly read articles.' The prospectus outperformed the product."
The prospectus outperformed the product.
See also
The TemplateThe Asterisk
The Holdover
hold·o·ver /ˈhəʊld.əʊ.vər/
Has been on this app so long they have genuinely forgotten why they joined. The profile photos are from a different era of their life. The bio was written by someone considerably more optimistic. Replies arrive days later with no acknowledgment of the gap. They are not unkind — just no longer really looking. The app has become a background condition, like a subscription they keep meaning to cancel but never quite do. The hope left some time ago. The profile stayed. You are essentially corresponding with a person who used to live at this address.
Where found
Profile photos clearly from a significantly earlier chapter
Replies that arrive 72 hours later with no explanation
Bio that reads like it was written by someone more hopeful
"Profile photo from 2020. Bio says 'new to this.' The hope left. The profile stayed. Holdover."
The hope left. The profile stayed.
See also
The BenchmarkThe Just Browsing
Section 3
Male-coded Lexicon
6 archetypes that skew male in behaviour or presentation — recognisable across every city, every app.
The Mysterio
mys·te·ri·o /mɪˈstɪər.i.əʊ/
Has decided, unilaterally, that mystery is a personality. One photo — possibly blurry, possibly sunglasses, possibly both. No bio, no location, no indication of what they want or who they are. An enormous confidence that this approach is compelling rather than deeply concerning. You are expected to invest time, energy, and genuine curiosity in decoding someone who could not spare five minutes to fill a profile. The audacity is, in its own way, genuinely impressive.
Where found
"Meet me to know me" where the bio should be
Age: "ask me." Location: "nearby." Everything else: not your concern.
First message: "tell me about yourself" — from a completely blank profile
"One blurry photo. No bio. First message asking me to describe myself. The audacity. Unmatched."
The less they shared, the more they expected.
See also
The AsteriskThe Keyboard Lover
The Situationship Specialist
si·tu·a·tion·ship spe·cia·list
Has very clear intentions — none of which include being introduced to your friends, remembered on your birthday, or present at anything requiring a plus-one. Charming, available, and genuinely enjoyable for exactly as long as the evening lasts. Does not ghost, does not mislead — simply operates on a personal timeline that ends before any conversation involving the future. The arrangement suits them perfectly. The problem is they forgot to mention the arrangement existed.
Where found
Bios that say "living in the moment, no pressure"
Available for plans under 48 hours. Unavailable for plans that mean something.
Mysteriously quiet whenever the word "us" appears
"He was consistent, attentive, and always available. Then I introduced him as 'someone I'm seeing.' He corrected it. Gently. But he corrected it."
Should have read the fine print.
See also
The SprinterThe Fence-Sitter
The Template
tem·plate /ˈtem.pleɪt/
Has not so much built a profile as assembled one from parts known to perform well. Photo one: with a dog that is not his. Photo two: at a café, looking at something off-camera. Photo three: a hill station, arms out. Photo four: black and white, looking away. Bio: dog dad, gym, sunsets, here for real connections. Every word optimised for approval and minimum revelation. Swipe enough and you realise you have seen this exact person before. Different face. Same layout. Same dog.
Where found
"I like to laugh" stated as a distinguishing personality trait
A hiking photo from 2021 doing heavy lifting today
"Fluent in sarcasm" — still, in this year, from an adult
"Café, mountain, dog, black and white. Didn't read the bio. I'd already read it."
Different face. Same profile. Same dog.
See also
The ProspectusThe Mysterio
The Sprinter
sprin·ter /ˈsprɪn.tər/
Arrives at full intensity and disappears at precisely the same speed. The profile is barely read and three venues are already suggested. The first date is polished, punctual, and warm — genuinely good, even. And then silence. Not an awkward silence. A complete silence. No explanation, no slow fade, simply gone. The enthusiasm was for the beginning of things, not the thing itself. The urgency to meet was inversely proportional to any interest in what came after.
Where found
"Want to meet this weekend? I don't believe in overthinking."
Sent before four messages have been exchanged
A perfect first date. No second message ever.
"Great conversation, great date. Radio silence since. The race ended at the finish line."
The race ended at the finish line.
See also
The Situationship SpecialistThe Passenger
The Keyboard Lover
key·board lov·er /ˈkiː.bɔːd ˌlʌv.ər/
A person for whom vowels are apparently expensive and punctuation entirely optional. Every message is three words or fewer, delivered as though doing you a personal favour by responding at all — and yet they keep initiating. Hru. sup. wnt 2 mt. This is not merely an opening line. This is a complete preview of the attention, effort, presence, and emotional investment they would bring to an actual relationship. Consider yourself warned. The bar is not low. The bar is the floor, and they are comfortably beneath it.
Where found
First message: "hru?" Sent at 11pm. No context.
Replies "k" to a paragraph you spent six minutes writing
Has never, in recorded history, used a full stop
"First: 'sup'. Second: 'wnt 2 mt'. I did not. The bar was the floor."
The bar was the floor.
See also
The SprinterThe Mysterio
The Passenger
pas·sen·ger /ˈpæs.ɪn.dʒər/
Always in the chat. Warm, responsive, and genuinely pleasant company. Has never once initiated a plan, suggested a topic, or moved anything forward. You are doing all the emotional labour of building this — choosing venues, asking questions, keeping things alive — while he enjoys the ride without comment. Not hostile, not avoidant, just entirely and serenely passive. If you stopped texting, the conversation would end. Not because he would ghost — because it would simply never occur to him that something needed restarting.
Where found
Responds to everything. Has initiated nothing.
Says "sounds good" to every plan. Suggests no plan of his own.
Has never once asked "what are you up to this weekend?"
"Three weeks. Every topic mine. Every plan mine. Lovely company. Never once took the wheel."
Lovely company. Never once took the wheel.
See also
The PenpalThe Fence-Sitter
Section 4
Female-coded Lexicon
6 archetypes that skew female in behaviour or presentation — the profile tells a story, just not always the right one.
The Bio Philosopher
bi·o phi·los·o·pher /ˈbaɪ.əʊ fɪˈlɒs.ə.fər/
"If you can't handle me at my worst, you don't deserve me at my best." The bio is a philosophical position, not an introduction. No name, no interests, no indication of what she is looking for or who she actually is. She is not telling you about herself — she is issuing a preemptive set of terms and conditions before you have even started. What "worst" means is left entirely as an exercise for the reader. What "best" looks like is, presumably, worth finding out — though the application process is considerably more competitive than the bio suggests it ought to be.
Where found
Bio is a quote. Unattributed. Carrying the full weight of her personality.
"Not here for games" — games unspecified, terms undefined
Conditions set before a single piece of information is offered
"Entire bio was a warning and a Marilyn Monroe quote. Bio Philosopher. No further information provided."
What worst means is left to the reader.
See also
The Requirement ListerThe Just Browsing
The Just Browsing
just brow·sing /dʒʌst ˈbraʊ.zɪŋ/
"Quite happy on my own, just seeing what's out there." The disclaimer is filed before the conversation has started. Not because it is true — but because saying it first means never having to admit they hoped for more if it doesn't work out. The profile is the door quietly left open. The bio is the cover story maintained for plausible deniability. They want exactly what everyone else on this app wants. They simply cannot afford to let you know that yet. The profile is always the tell. The bio is just the cover.
Where found
"Not really looking but open if something happens"
Checks the app seventeen times a day, "casually"
"No pressure — I'm fine either way" (not fine either way)
"Said she wasn't really looking. Three months of daily conversation. The profile was always the tell."
The profile is the tell. The bio is the cover.
See also
The HoldoverThe Fence-Sitter
The Filter Master
fil·ter mas·ter /ˈfɪl.tər ˈmɑː.stər/
Every photograph is the same angle, the same light, the same filter applied with considerable expertise. You have essentially been introduced to a preferred colour palette and a camera tilt — not a person. The first meeting involves a moment of quiet recalibration on both sides that neither party acknowledges aloud. Not deception in the traditional sense. More a very optimistic interpretation of what photography, good lighting, and the right app can collectively achieve for a Tuesday afternoon in ordinary circumstances.
Where found
Six photos, same corner, same ring light, same expression
Every shot from above, slightly to the left, in golden hour only
Not one photograph in ordinary daylight at ordinary eye level
"We met. There was a pause. We both understood. The filter had been doing significant work."
The first meeting involves quiet recalibration.
See also
The Crowd SourcerThe Prospectus
The Crowd Sourcer
crowd sour·cer /kraʊd ˈsɔː.sər/
Every photograph features other people, a special occasion, or generously both. Wedding reception, birthday dinner, girls' trip — always dressed, always surrounded, always mid-laugh at something happening entirely off-camera. You have spent four minutes attempting to identify which person she is. You have guessed incorrectly at least twice. You have no idea what she looks like on a Wednesday morning in ordinary light, and this appears to be entirely the intention.
Where found
Six group photos across six different occasions
The most photogenic person strategically central in each shot
Not one photograph of just her, in any ordinary circumstance
"Five minutes identifying her. Guessed wrong. The crowd was doing all the work. Crowd Sourcer."
You have guessed wrong twice.
See also
The Filter MasterThe Mysterio
The Requirement Lister
re·quire·ment lis·ter /rɪˈkwaɪər.mənt ˈlɪs.tər/
The bio is composed entirely of what she does not want. No time-wasters. No hook-ups. No boring people. Must love dogs. Six feet minimum. Don't message if you're only going to say hi. The list of requirements is considerably longer than any description of herself, her interests, or what she might bring to another person's life. She has described the ideal candidate in exhaustive and specific detail. The application form, as always, is considerably more detailed than the job description. The position, one suspects, has been vacant for some time.
Where found
Bios with significantly more "no" than "yes"
"6ft+ only. Don't message if you're not serious." — as an opener
Zero information about who she is. Extensive detail about who she'll accept.
"Eight requirements listed. Zero interests shared. The position has been vacant for some time."
The position has been vacant for some time.
See also
The Bio PhilosopherThe Fence-Sitter
The Age Avoider
age a·voi·der /eɪdʒ əˈvɔɪ.dər/
Has been 34 for three consecutive years and shows no signs of turning 35. The profile age and the apparent age are having a quiet disagreement that neither party is addressing publicly. The photos offer no definitive evidence either way — some recent, some timeless, one suspiciously well-lit. Age is treated less as a fact and more as a general direction. Not the same as The Asterisk — this is vanity, not deception about availability. The stakes are lower. The number is simply treated as approximate, negotiable, and subject to periodic revision without announcement.
Where found
Profile age and apparent age quietly disagreeing
"Age is just a number 😊" somewhere in the bio
References to events that don't match the listed birth year
"Said 34. Finished college in 2001. The maths did not cooperate. Age Avoider. The number was approximate."
The number is approximate.
See also
The AsteriskThe Filter Master